Mercura vs Tacton
VS
A Direct Comparison of CPQ Solutions
Compare features, flexibility, and costs — and see which solution fits best for modern manufacturing companies.
Many companies experience challenges with implementation time and complexity in Tacton.
Comparison
Strategic Overview
Where does Mercura stand out?
- Fast deployment
- Flexible product configuration
- ERP-native integrations
- Lower dependency on consultancy projects
- Faster ROI
When does Tacton make sense?
- Enterprise manufacturing environments
- Complex engineering workflows
- Organizations with large IT teams
- Acceptance of longer implementation timelines
Direct comparison of Mercura and Tacton
| Feature | Mercura | Tacton |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native platform |  | Partial |
| Implementation time | Weeks | Often months |
| Product configurator flexibility | | High |
| No-code / low-code rules | | Limited |
| Modern UI | | Traditional |
| ERP integration | Standard connectors | Often custom |
| Total cost transparency | | Varies |
| Scaling | High | Complex |
Price vs Total Cost
Economic Overview
Mercura
- Transparent SaaS model
- Fewer hidden costs
- Easier scaling over time
Tacton
- Often implemented as larger consultancy projects
- Higher upfront costs
- More complex scaling
Customer Case
Valve Manufacturer
A leading valve manufacturer needed to streamline their sales process for complex configurable products.
They required deep ERP integration for real-time pricing and internal ownership of product rules.
- Complex configurations simplified
- ERP-driven pricing
- Internal rule ownership
Google Rating
5.0
G2 Rating
5.0
"Mercura allowed us to take control of our product logic and deliver accurate quotes faster."
M
Sales Director, Industrial Valve Manufacturer
Request a CPQ demo