Mercura vs Experlogix
VS
A Direct Comparison of CPQ Solutions
Compare features, flexibility, and costs — and see which solution fits best for modern manufacturing companies.
Many companies experience challenges with implementation time and complexity in Experlogix.
Comparison
Strategic Overview
Where does Mercura stand out?
- Fast deployment
- Built for modern web experiences
- Flexible product configuration
- Lower dependency on consultancy projects
- Faster ROI
When does Experlogix make sense?
- Deep Microsoft Dynamics dependency
- On-premise legacy requirements
- Organizations with large IT teams
- Acceptance of longer implementation timelines
Direct comparison of Mercura and Experlogix
| Feature | Mercura | Experlogix |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native platform |  | Partial |
| Implementation time | Weeks | Months / Years |
| Product configurator flexibility | | Microsoft-constrained |
| No-code / low-code rules | | Limited |
| Modern UI | | Legacy UI |
| ERP integration | Standard connectors | Microsoft-focused |
| Total cost transparency | | Varies |
| Scaling | High | Complex |
Price vs Total Cost
Economic Overview
Mercura
- Transparent SaaS model
- Fewer hidden costs
- Easier scaling over time
Experlogix
- Often tied to complex licensing models
- Higher maintenance costs
- More complex scaling
Customer Case
Machinery Manufacturer
A global machinery manufacturer needed a modern CPQ solution that wasn't limited by their legacy ERP constraints.
They required a flexible configurator that could be deployed quickly across multiple sales channels.
- Modern web-based configuration
- Rapid multi-channel deployment
- Reduced IT dependency
Google Rating
5.0
G2 Rating
5.0
"Mercura gave us the agility we needed to launch our new product line globally in record time."
M
IT Director, Global Machinery Manufacturer
Request a CPQ demo